• The Problem

  • Private property

it would seem that not many people in the USA do not realize that TX is the only state, that did not give up the property of its citizens in bankruptcy of 1933. all other states the governor gave /pledged the property of their citizens to the US government.

so today in this country ( somehow TX is still collecting property taxes when the state still holds the property rights) unless you do a acknowledgement of the property(deed) and file it into the property file at the county where the property is located you are part of the land lease system, So then you pay property taxes which are really lease payment. this happen when the title company’s were started in the mid 1930’s the acceptance of the deed is no longer required. A person can google acceptance of the deed in all 50 states to see what to do in in the state where the property is located.

when you get the thing filed then you only get a number the name is no longer there ,because it is now truly private property.

Case in point,,,,, Oregon is controlling the water to the farms well the state really owns the land so if they want water restrictions then go ahead as we volunteer to pay lease payments ,,,,,why because we have been lied to about this subject due to the amount of money the so called government is collecting because us sheeple don’t know any better MY PEOPLE FAIL FOR A LACK OF KNOWLEDGE

this is only a comment about why certain property rights are trampled on, or this could be just the tip of a iceberg a very big one at that

thank you BB

    Bruce H Bryant Excellent points, Bruce. I was not aware of the unique status of TX in regards to private property!

        Foster Gamble Foster, If I remember correctly, quite a few years ago you informed your followers about the hidden budgets of cities. You gave a specific name, something like “Comprehensive ????”
        I have been searching for that without success.

            unwitting_labrat I think you might be thinking of CAFRs (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report). Foster discusses it in one of his first blogs.

                Rob Leslie Thank you, Rob. That was Foster’s presentation that I still remember and for which I was searching.

                  2 months later

                  Counter-point:

                  All un-constitutional laws are, well, unconstitutional!

                  And any laws signed into law by lawmakers who were not legally seated (i.e. like through an election where all legal votes were not counted) are null and void.

                  So from that perspective the future is very bright!